Yesterday, in the first U.S. ruling on the closely scrutinized question of fair use in the AI-related copyright litigation context, U.S. Circuit ...
Thomson Reuters has won an early battle in court over the question of fair use in artificial intelligence-related copyright ...
After reconsidering the case, the judge issued a partial summary judgement, which asks whether a non-generative AI system’s ...
HOW ‘FAIR USE’ WORKS. The fair use doctrine exists to safeguard freedom of expression and to create an environment that ...
The case, filed in 2020, accused Ross Intelligence of reproducing materials from Thomson Reuters' Westlaw legal research ...
In the first AI copyright case ruling, a court concludes that training an AI system using copyrighted material isn't fair use. That will likely be cited by creators fighting other tech giants.
An AI company lifted material from Thomson Reuters' research platform, arguing fair use and innocent infringement. A court has ruled it was copyright violation.
The Thomson Reuters decision has big implications for the battle between generative AI companies and rights holders.
A federal judge in Delaware on Tuesday said that a former competitor of Thomson Reuters was not permitted by U.S. copyright ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results